<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Syntax / Commands &#8211; Facebook should also support them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/twitter-syntax-commands-facebook-should-also-support-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/twitter-syntax-commands-facebook-should-also-support-them/</link>
	<description>I think I can, I know I can</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:35:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/twitter-syntax-commands-facebook-should-also-support-them/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/twitter-syntax-commands-facebook-should-also-support-them/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Great point Justin! The user experience is going to be tough to nail, so that users would actually use something like this.

I think the new Facebook usernames that were recently introduced could at least provide a unique identifier.

In order for them to be used, Facebook would need to make these usernames clearly visible everywhere and make the new Markup easy to use.

Cheers,
Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Justin! The user experience is going to be tough to nail, so that users would actually use something like this.</p>
<p>I think the new Facebook usernames that were recently introduced could at least provide a unique identifier.</p>
<p>In order for them to be used, Facebook would need to make these usernames clearly visible everywhere and make the new Markup easy to use.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin James</title>
		<link>http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/twitter-syntax-commands-facebook-should-also-support-them/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 04:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonkragh.com/index.php/twitter-syntax-commands-facebook-should-also-support-them/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed a lot of people on Facebook already using the @username and #groupname syntax. The problem is with Facebook, they don&#039;t have usernames, and doing it by actual name would make it tough to discriminate between a two (or more) name name and actual spaces. For example, does:

&quot;@Sally Marion Knuth I found your wallet at my place after the party last night... come get it when you get a chance!&quot; mean &quot;@Sally&quot;, &quot;@Sally Marion&quot;, or &quot;@Sally Marion Knuth&quot;?

J.Ja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a lot of people on Facebook already using the @username and #groupname syntax. The problem is with Facebook, they don&#8217;t have usernames, and doing it by actual name would make it tough to discriminate between a two (or more) name name and actual spaces. For example, does:</p>
<p>&#8220;@Sally Marion Knuth I found your wallet at my place after the party last night&#8230; come get it when you get a chance!&#8221; mean &#8220;@Sally&#8221;, &#8220;@Sally Marion&#8221;, or &#8220;@Sally Marion Knuth&#8221;?</p>
<p>J.Ja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
